diff --git a/workflow/demo/offer-en-ai-assisted.bpmn b/workflow/demo/offer-en-ai-assisted.bpmn
index 496824b..69623a9 100644
--- a/workflow/demo/offer-en-ai-assisted.bpmn
+++ b/workflow/demo/offer-en-ai-assisted.bpmn
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ Address: customer.country customer.zip
- $created
sequenceFlow_vqv8cw
sequenceFlow_XAS6SA
-
+
@@ -2105,7 +2105,7 @@ Betrag: _amount (Brutto € _amount_brutto
- customer.country
customer.zip
{"n_predict": 2048, "temperature": 0.2, "top_p": 0.9}
-
+## 2. DUAL-USE ASSESSMENT (EU Regulation 2021/821)
+
+Assess whether the offered products could fall under dual-use classification
+according to Annex I of EU Regulation 2021/821. Evaluate by category:
+
+- **Cat. 1 – Advanced Materials**: composites, coatings, specialty alloys
+ usable in aerospace or defense applications
+- **Cat. 3 – Electronics**: processors, FPGAs, RF components,
+ power amplifiers, signal converters above civilian thresholds
+- **Cat. 4 – Computers**: high-performance computing, ruggedized systems
+- **Cat. 6 – Sensors & Lasers**: thermal imaging, night vision,
+ LIDAR, hyperspectral sensors, laser rangefinders
+- **Cat. 7 – Navigation & Avionics**: GNSS receivers, IMUs,
+ accelerometers, gyroscopes, flight controllers, autopilot systems
+- **Cat. 9 – Aerospace & Propulsion**: UAV components, propulsion systems,
+ thrust control, altitude control systems, parachute release mechanisms
+
+Also assess product combinations: individually harmless components may form
+a controlled system when combined (e.g. flight controller + propulsion +
+thermal camera = potential UAV surveillance system).
+
+If no export control classification number (ECCN or EU list position) is
+provided, assess based on product description and technical specifications
+whether dual-use potential is plausible.
+
+---
+
+## 3. END-USE & END-USER ASSESSMENT
+
+Evaluate the plausibility and completeness of the declared end-use:
+
+- Is the stated end-use consistent with the customer's business profile?
+- Is the stated end-use consistent with the product's technical capabilities?
+- Is the order quantity plausible for the declared purpose?
+- Are there indicators of re-sale or re-export intent
+ (e.g. trading company, no identifiable own operations)?
+
+Flag the following as hard red flags requiring immediate escalation:
+- End-use explicitly or implicitly military in a restricted country
+- End-use declared as "general purpose", "various", or left blank
+- Customer refuses to specify end-use or end-user
+- Delivery address is a freight forwarder or logistics hub with no
+ identifiable final recipient
+- Requested delivery timeline inconsistent with legitimate procurement cycles
+
+---
+
+## 4. RISK ASSESSMENT OUTPUT
+
+Provide your assessment as follows:
+
+**Risk Level**:
+- GREEN – No indicators of concern identified; proceed subject to standard process
+- YELLOW – One or more soft indicators present; enhanced due diligence required
+ before offer release
+- RED – One or more hard red flags present; do not release offer; escalate immediately
+
+**Findings**:
+List only case-specific observations derived from the provided process context.
+Do not include general compliance guidance. Each finding must reference a
+specific data point from the input (product, country, customer attribute,
+end-use statement, etc.).
+
+**Recommendation**:
+One concrete next step only:
+- "Proceed"
+- "Request end-use certificate and end-user declaration before offer release"
+- "Verify customer against restricted party lists before proceeding"
+- "Escalate to compliance officer – do not release offer"
+- "Clarify end-use and final recipient with customer"
+
+Base your analysis strictly on the provided process context.
+Do not invent or assume facts not present in the input.
+]]]]>
_amount (Brutto € _amount_brutto
-
+
@@ -2781,8 +2855,8 @@ Betrag: _amount (Brutto € _amount_brutto
-
-
+
+
@@ -2858,8 +2932,8 @@ Betrag: _amount (Brutto € _amount_brutto
-
-
+
+